Topic 7B — Customary law of delict
Prescribed: Himonga & Nhlapo Ch 12 (+ recommended Knoetze on family-head liability; Ngema & Daba on seduction). Story arc: same elements as common law, communal liability, fixed cattle fines — all under constitutional revision.
Delict in 60 seconds
Same five elements as common law. The family head answers for members (revised for equality). Most delicts carry fixed fines; blood cases don’t. Know the four: defamation (witchcraft/chastity, restorative remedy), adultery (husband claims — now contested), seduction (beasts + act immediately), ukuthwala (custom unless consent is refused). Demand first, then sue; delay rots proof (Lequoa) but debts don’t prescribe (Moima).
1. Elements and liability
Five identical elements
Act (commission/omission) + wrongfulness (legally reprehensible) + fault (intent/negligence) + causation + harm. Customary law had no single word for "delict" but punished the wrong the same way. Use the five to test new wrongs (forced initiation, bullying, sterility-slurs, protocol violations).
Who answers? The family head — revised
Rule: the head is vicariously liable for members' delicts and sues for delicts against them. Codes s 102: father/guardian/head liable for a minor inmate of the same home — proceedings run against minor jointly with the head. Revision: adults are majors; patriarchs no longer "represent" — seniors now assist the vulnerable (equality, dignity, Children's Act; mothers in practice).
Fixed fines vs "blood" cases
Most delicts carry predetermined fines — prove the elements, skip quantified loss. Exception: blood cases (assault, theft, wrongs touching the leader) — no fixed scale; the offender could be "eaten up" and the beast is shared: "a man may not eat his own blood."
2. The four delicts
Defamation — narrow by design
s 93 Codes: every malicious allegation of evil conduct such as witchcraft is actionable — Mogale (SCA) confines customary defamation essentially to this. s 94 adds impeaching an unmarried woman's chastity. Defences: quarrel-words cured by prompt public apology; good-faith report to authority without malice. Remedy direction (CaseDikoko + ubuntu): restorative — apology and harmony over ruinous awards.
Adultery — and the equality attack
Traditional (s 99): only the husband claims (per-act fine; wife's remedy is divorce); covers wives in marriage and widows in ukungena unions or unsettled estates. Quantum: full fine per separate act; pregnancy may raise it (community-dependent); keep the marriage → capped damages; end it → sue for lobolo paid. Three defences: reasonable belief of abandonment; collusion/connivance (Mswala v Fleni — staged catch); desertion without return-intent. Procedure: immediate report at the adulterer's kraal + demand. Note: ignorance that she was married is no defence — and custom treats endless per-act claims as immoral, steering the husband to divorce plus lobolo return instead.
Widows: who sues, who keeps?
The ukungena consort sues — but the fine belongs to the widow's house / deceased's estate (Mdoda v Skeyi), and only where she lives as a recognised ukungena wife. (amaXhosa: kin-widow intercourse is also incest.)
Seduction — beasts, scales, debate
Ngquthu (defloration — to the mother), mvimba (per pregnancy, even miscarried), umgezo (cleansing). Scales: Zulu 1+1+cleansing; Sotho/Tswana 2 for defloration, 4 for up to two pregnancies; Pedi max 3. Procedure: girl reports at once, parents act immediately (delay fatal). Death: claim dies with her (unless in related childbirth) — but an heir inherits the action. Debate: abolish as virginity-commodifying gender stereotyping (Bohler-Muller) vs defend as culture — argue both.
Ukuthwala — custom vs delict vs crime
Carrying-away to open marriage talks is custom (even agreed elopement). It becomes delict only where the guardian's consent is absent and the family refuses to negotiate (insult, bypassed consent) — damages merge into lobolo (Xhosa: 1 beast + seduction; Sotho: marry her or pay lobolo-value). Forcible "marriage" is void (Mfeketho) and may be kidnapping/rape — SALRC Project 138; Jezile marks the criminal line.
3. Procedure and prescription
Act now, demand first, heirs step in
Demand is compulsory (oral suffices): approach wrongdoer + family head jointly with prima-facie proof, then sue in the leader's (or other competent) court. Action begun before death binds the heir ("once instituted it does not die"); no prior action + death = lapse (Mgangabode). Prescription: none by time alone (Moima — a debt must be repaid), but delay rots proof: Lequoa demands immediate moves where denial is likely or timing fixes liability (seduction). Heirs inherit rights and locus standi.